From: "bibo,mao" <bibo.mao@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "bibo,mao" <bibo.mao@intel.com>,
jbeulich@novell.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]x86_64 debug_stack nested patch (again)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:42:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44699E8C.2070002@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605111328.45244.ak@suse.de>
Sorry for late reply, interrupt is disabled when int3/int1 trap happens
and NMI is not permitted for kprobe in x86_64 platform,nest level of kprobe
is 2 at most. So that will work well if DEBUG_STACK is set to 8K when CONFIG_KPROBE
option is set.
Thanks
bibo,mao
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 13:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> "bibo,mao" <bibo.mao@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> In x86_64 platform, INT1 and INT3 trap stack is IST stack called DEBUG_STACK,
>>> when INT1/INT3 trap happens, system will switch to DEBUG_STACK by hardware.
>>> Current DEBUG_STACK size is 4K, when int1/int3 trap happens, kernel will
>>> minus current DEBUG_STACK IST value by 4k. But if int3/int1 trap is nested,
>>> it will destroy other vector's IST stack. This patch modifies this, it sets
>>> DEBUG_STACK size as 8K and allows two level of nested int1/int3 trap.
>>>
>>> Kprobe DEBUG_STACK may be nested, because kprobe hanlder may be probed
>>> by other kprobes. This patch is against 2.6.17-rc3. Thanks jbeulich for pointing out error in the first patch.
>>>
>>> Signed-Off-By: bibo, mao <bibo.mao@intel.com>
>>>
>>> --- 2.6.17-rc3.org/include/asm-x86_64/page.h 2006-05-10 12:07:18.000000000 +0800
>>> +++ 2.6.17-rc3/include/asm-x86_64/page.h 2006-05-10 12:19:24.000000000 +0800
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>>> #define EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER 0
>>> #define EXCEPTION_STKSZ (PAGE_SIZE << EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER)
>>>
>>> -#define DEBUG_STACK_ORDER EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER
>>> +#define DEBUG_STACK_ORDER (EXCEPTION_STACK_ORDER + 1)
>>> #define DEBUG_STKSZ (PAGE_SIZE << DEBUG_STACK_ORDER)
>>>
>>> #define IRQSTACK_ORDER 2
>> So.... why not do it this way?
>
> Last time we discussed this I was told it could nest upto 3 or 4 times
> So that still wouldn't work.
>
> If anything they should decrease the int3/debug stack to 2K, then 8K
> might be enough.
>
> Or even better would be to fix kprobes to not do that.
>
> I think paranoidentry would need to be fixed for that too.
>
> -Andi
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-10 9:26 [PATCH]x86_64 debug_stack nested patch (again) bibo,mao
2006-05-11 11:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-11 11:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-16 9:42 ` bibo,mao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44699E8C.2070002@intel.com \
--to=bibo.mao@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox