From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <Vincent.Fortier1@EC.GC.CA>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel vs drivers releases?
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:45:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446B5329.7010007@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8E8F647D7835334B985D069AE964A4F7024640@ECQCMTLMAIL1.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca>
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] wrote:
> On the other hand many people want's to get a full stabilisation of the
> actual API...
Not meaning to sound harsh, I think you belong in this category:
You think you want a stable kernel interface, but you really do
not, and you don't even know it.
See Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-17 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-17 12:31 Kernel vs drivers releases? Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2006-05-17 12:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-17 16:45 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446B5329.7010007@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=Vincent.Fortier1@EC.GC.CA \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox