From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751322AbWEWKYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 06:24:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751323AbWEWKYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 06:24:39 -0400 Received: from smtp108.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.218]:20827 "HELO smtp108.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751322AbWEWKYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 06:24:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xjnGvrtOO9qpDhf+1witkzOXHCCJazsQxq7wdXlk/xIQbMq4Kb3ZhGrRJWBXNxoLzdcJ6Ga8Ph/cvkF9eAUvMWaOzXXbHGKJZ3Xszx6nno4We/pGH4CD/9IiuMuvipLxu/zAECGutmpYGmhVcVn4o7w7s9ihOZNx8CQaDlUvMKI= ; Message-ID: <4472E2E0.4000201@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:24:32 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Haar_J=E1nos?= CC: kernel@kolivas.org, cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: swapper: page allocation failure. - random reboot problem References: <00e901c67cad$fe9a9d90$1800a8c0@dcccs> <200605222117.27433.kernel@kolivas.org> <031001c67db1$a8c4a1e0$1800a8c0@dcccs> <200605230112.45564.kernel@kolivas.org> <047401c67de3$a05a52c0$1800a8c0@dcccs> <4472D327.3060808@yahoo.com.au> <013601c67e51$eef03c10$1800a8c0@dcccs> In-Reply-To: <013601c67e51$eef03c10$1800a8c0@dcccs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Haar János wrote: > Sorry, i have allready did these things. > > The motherboard + CPU + RAM successed the overnight memtest, but anyway i > have replaced this group with another pre-tested ones, but no change! > (Additionally, i replaced the NIC [e1000 to e1000, and e1000 to realtek], > the sata cards [promise to promise], the sata and ide cables, mb, cpu, ram, > ps, and the power cable too. > Only the 12hdd is the same, but smart reports no errors at all!) > The power supply is the 3rd. and the problem is the same. But is the power supply rated enough to support all the drives? I have seen random reboots where the power supply wasn't good enough. > > This is really a software bug, but i dont know exactly where. Could be. memtest doesn't guarantee anything though... -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com