public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:59:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44733F7B.9070009@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060519092411.6b859b51.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> My patch series is a proposal for a generic implementation of statistics.
> 
> This uses debugfs for the user interface, but the
> per-task-delay-accounting-*.patch series from Balbir creates an extensible
> netlink-based system for passing instrumentation results back to userspace.
> 
> Can this code be converted to use those netlink interfaces, or is Balbir's
> approach unsuitable, or hasn't it even been considered, or what?
> 

Andrew,

taskstats, Balbir'r approach, is too specific and doesn't work for me.
It is by design limited to per-task data.

My statistics code is not limited to per-task statistics, but allows exploiters
to have data been accumulated and been shown for whatever entity they need to,
may it be for tasks, for SCSI disks, per adapter, per queue, per interface,
for a device driver, etc.

If you want me to change my code to use netlink anyway, I might be able to
implement my own genetlink family. I haven't look at the details of that yet.

	Martin




  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-23 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-19 16:07 [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure Martin Peschke
2006-05-19 16:24 ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]   ` <661de9470605191159n75578d60qd1f3309e3a7e2234@mail.gmail.com>
2006-05-19 19:02     ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-19 23:03   ` Martin Peschke
2006-05-21 11:29     ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:09   ` netlink vs. debugfs (was Re: [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure) Tim Bird
2006-05-22 18:34     ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-22 18:53       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-23 16:59   ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2006-05-23 21:42     ` [Patch 0/6] statistics infrastructure Andrew Morton
2006-05-24  3:12       ` Balbir Singh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-24 12:27 Martin Peschke
2006-05-23 20:42 Al Boldi
2005-12-14 16:13 [patch " Martin Peschke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44733F7B.9070009@de.ibm.com \
    --to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox