Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jeff Garzik]

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> gt96100eth use pci probing
> 
> Convert pci_find_device to pci probing. Use dev_* macros for printing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> commit 4bdf11796756f0bdc50d2f4251d7a405fcbfd9b6
> tree ed9cfdec21d187307abebff973ab963d767bc51d
> parent 75664d3c6fe1d8d00b87e42cc001cb5d90613dae
> author Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Thu, 25 May 2006 02:09:25 +0159
> committer Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Thu, 25 May 2006 02:09:25 +0159
> 
>  drivers/net/gt96100eth.c |  167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c b/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
> index 2d24354..47095ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ #define GT96100_DEBUG 2
>  
>  #include "gt96100eth.h"
>  
> +struct gt96100_if_t;
> +
>  // prototypes
>  static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
>  static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
> @@ -65,8 +67,6 @@ static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct
>  static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
>  static int read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg);
>  static int write_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg, u16 data);
> -static int gt96100_init_module(void);
> -static void gt96100_cleanup_module(void);
>  static void dump_MII(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev);
>  static void dump_tx_desc(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev, int i);
>  static void dump_rx_desc(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev, int i);
> @@ -77,7 +77,11 @@ static void abort(struct net_device *dev
>  static void hard_stop(struct net_device *dev);
>  static void enable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev);
>  static void disable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev);
> -static int gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pci, int port_num);
> +static int __devinit gt96100_probe(struct pci_dev *,
> +		const struct pci_device_id *);
> +static void __devexit gt96100_remove(struct pci_dev *);
> +static int gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *, int);
> +static void gt96100_remove1(struct gt96100_if_t *);
>  static void reset_tx(struct net_device *dev);
>  static void reset_rx(struct net_device *dev);
>  static int gt96100_check_tx_consistent(struct gt96100_private *gp);
> @@ -600,57 +604,93 @@ disable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev
>  	GT96100ETH_WRITE(gp, GT96100_ETH_INT_MASK, 0);
>  }
>  
> +static struct pci_device_id gt96100_pci_tbl[] = {
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100A) },
> +	{ 0 }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, gt96100_pci_tbl);
>  
> -/*
> - * Init GT96100 ethernet controller driver
> - */
> -static int gt96100_init_module(void)
> +static struct pci_driver gt96100_driver = {
> +	.name		= "isicom",
> +	.id_table	= gt96100_pci_tbl,
> +	.probe		= gt96100_probe,
> +	.remove		= __devexit_p(gt96100_remove)
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit gt96100_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +		const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  {
> -	struct pci_dev *pci;
> -	int i, retval=0;
> -	u32 cpuConfig;
> +	struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs;
> +	unsigned int i, j;
> +	int retval;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Stupid probe because this really isn't a PCI device
> -	 */
> -	if (!(pci = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
> -	                            PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100, NULL)) &&
> -	    !(pci = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
> -		                    PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100A, NULL))) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR __FILE__ ": GT96100 not found!\n");
> +	if (GT96100_READ(GT96100_CPU_INTERF_CONFIG) & (1 << 12)) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "must be in Big Endian mode!\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpuConfig = GT96100_READ(GT96100_CPU_INTERF_CONFIG);
> -	if (cpuConfig & (1<<12)) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR __FILE__
> -		       ": must be in Big Endian mode!\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;

Please don't include silly and unnecessary pseudo-optimizations like 
eliminating the cpuConfig variable.  The maintainer may have felt it was 
more readable in its original form (as do I).


> +	gtifs = kmalloc(sizeof(gt96100_iflist), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (gtifs == NULL) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to alloc ifs\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}

the kmalloc should go before we start touching the hardware.


> +	memcpy(gtifs, &gt96100_iflist, sizeof(gt96100_iflist));
> +
> +	pci_set_drvdata(pdev,gtifs);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
> +		retval = gt96100_probe1(pdev, i);
> +		if (retval)
> +			goto unprobe;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i=0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++)
> -		retval |= gt96100_probe1(pci, i);
> +	return 0;
> +unprobe:
> +	for (j = i; j > 0; j--) {
> +		struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[j - 1];
> +		gt96100_remove1(gtif);
> +	}
> +	kfree(gtifs);

upon failure, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL


> -static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pci, int port_num)
> +static void __devexit gt96100_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
> +		struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[i];
> +		gt96100_remove1(gtif);
> +	}
> +	kfree(gtifs);

on exit, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL


> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>  {
>  	struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
> -	struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
> +	struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>  	int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>  	u32 phyAD;
> -	int retval;
> +	int retval = -ENOMEM;
>  	unsigned char chip_rev;
>  	struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>      
>  	if (gtif->irq < 0) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
> -		      __FUNCTION__);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> +
> +	retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> +	if (retval) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
> +		return retval;
> +	}

bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded hardware

bug #2:  you call pci_enable_device() multiple times for the same PCI device


> -	pci_read_config_byte(pci, PCI_REVISION_ID, &chip_rev);
> +	pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &chip_rev);
>  
>  	if (chip_rev >= REV_GT96100A_1) {
>  		phyAD = GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_PHY_ADDR_REG);
> @@ -669,12 +709,12 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct 
>  	// probe for the external PHY
>  	if ((phy_id1 = read_MII(phy_addr, 2)) <= 0 ||
>  	    (phy_id2 = read_MII(phy_addr, 3)) <= 0) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no PHY found on MII%d\n", __FUNCTION__, port_num);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no PHY found on MII%d\n", port_num);
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  	
>  	if (!request_region(gtif->iobase, GT96100_ETH_IO_SIZE, "GT96100ETH")) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: request_region failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_region failed\n");
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -689,7 +729,7 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct 
>  	dev->irq = gtif->irq;
>  
>  	if ((retval = parse_mac_addr(dev, gtif->mac_str))) {
> -		err("%s: MAC address parse failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MAC address parse failed\n");
>  		retval = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out1;
>  	}
> @@ -704,12 +744,15 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct 
>  	gp->phy_addr = phy_addr;
>  	gp->chip_rev = chip_rev;
>  
> -	info("%s found at 0x%x, irq %d\n",
> -	     chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gtif->iobase, gtif->irq);
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s found at 0x%x, irq %d\n",
> +			chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gtif->iobase, gtif->irq);
>  	dump_hw_addr(0, dev, "%s: HW Address ", __FUNCTION__, dev->dev_addr);
> -	info("%s chip revision=%d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gp->chip_rev);
> -	info("%s ethernet port %d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gp->port_num);
> -	info("external PHY ID1=0x%04x, ID2=0x%04x\n", phy_id1, phy_id2);
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s chip revision=%d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
> +			gp->chip_rev);
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s ethernet port %d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
> +			gp->port_num);
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "external PHY ID1=0x%04x, ID2=0x%04x\n", phy_id1,
> +			phy_id2);
>  
>  	// Allocate Rx and Tx descriptor rings
>  	if (gp->rx_ring == NULL) {
> @@ -737,8 +780,8 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct 
>  		}
>  	}
>      
> -	dbg(3, "%s: rx_ring=%p, tx_ring=%p\n", __FUNCTION__,
> -	    gp->rx_ring, gp->tx_ring);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "rx_ring=%p, tx_ring=%p\n", gp->rx_ring,
> +			gp->tx_ring);
>  
>  	// Allocate Rx Hash Table
>  	if (gp->hash_table == NULL) {
> @@ -750,7 +793,7 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct 
>  		}
>  	}
>      
> -	dbg(3, "%s: hash=%p\n", __FUNCTION__, gp->hash_table);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "hash=%p\n", gp->hash_table);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&gp->lock);
>      
> @@ -781,10 +824,24 @@ out1:
>  out:
>  	release_region(gtif->iobase, GT96100_ETH_IO_SIZE);
>  
> -	err("%s failed.  Returns %d\n", __FUNCTION__, retval);
> +	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed.  Returns %d\n", __FUNCTION__, retval);
>  	return retval;

all this dev_foo() stuff creates patch noise.  It should be in a 
separate patch.


> +static void gt96100_remove1(struct gt96100_if_t *gtif)
> +{
> +	if (gtif->dev != NULL) {

unindent by doing

	if (gtif->dev == NULL)
		return;

	...


> +		struct gt96100_private *gp = netdev_priv(gtif->dev);
> +		unregister_netdev(gtif->dev);
> +		dmafree(RX_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, gp->hash_table_dma);
> +		dmafree(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE, gp->rx_buff);
> +		dmafree(sizeof(gt96100_rd_t) * RX_RING_SIZE
> +			+ sizeof(gt96100_td_t) * TX_RING_SIZE,
> +			gp->rx_ring);
> +		free_netdev(gtif->dev);
> +		release_region(gtif->iobase, gp->io_size);

shouldn't this be using pci_request_regions() / pci_release_regions() ?


>  static void
>  reset_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> @@ -1516,24 +1573,14 @@ gt96100_get_stats(struct net_device *dev
>  	return &gp->stats;
>  }
>  
> -static void gt96100_cleanup_module(void)
> +static int __init gt96100_init_module(void)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -	for (i=0; i<NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
> -		struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[i];
> -		if (gtif->dev != NULL) {
> -			struct gt96100_private *gp = (struct gt96100_private *)
> -				netdev_priv(gtif->dev);
> -			unregister_netdev(gtif->dev);
> -			dmafree(RX_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, gp->hash_table_dma);
> -			dmafree(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE, gp->rx_buff);
> -			dmafree(sizeof(gt96100_rd_t) * RX_RING_SIZE
> -				+ sizeof(gt96100_td_t) * TX_RING_SIZE,
> -				gp->rx_ring);
> -			free_netdev(gtif->dev);
> -			release_region(gtif->iobase, gp->io_size);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	return pci_register_driver(&gt96100_driver);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit gt96100_cleanup_module(void)
> +{
> +	pci_unregister_driver(&gt96100_driver);
>  }
>  
>  static int __init gt96100_setup(char *options)
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> gt96100eth use pci probing
>>
>> Convert pci_find_device to pci probing. Use dev_* macros for printing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> commit 4bdf11796756f0bdc50d2f4251d7a405fcbfd9b6
>> tree ed9cfdec21d187307abebff973ab963d767bc51d
>> parent 75664d3c6fe1d8d00b87e42cc001cb5d90613dae
>> author Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Thu, 25 May 2006 02:09:25
>> +0159
>> committer Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Thu, 25 May 2006
>> 02:09:25 +0159
>>
>>  drivers/net/gt96100eth.c |  167
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c b/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
>> index 2d24354..47095ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ #define GT96100_DEBUG 2
>>  
>>  #include "gt96100eth.h"
>>  
>> +struct gt96100_if_t;
>> +
>>  // prototypes
>>  static void* dmaalloc(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
>>  static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vaddr);
>> @@ -65,8 +67,6 @@ static int gt96100_add_hash_entry(struct
>>  static void read_mib_counters(struct gt96100_private *gp);
>>  static int read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg);
>>  static int write_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg, u16 data);
>> -static int gt96100_init_module(void);
>> -static void gt96100_cleanup_module(void);
>>  static void dump_MII(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev);
>>  static void dump_tx_desc(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev, int i);
>>  static void dump_rx_desc(int dbg_lvl, struct net_device *dev, int i);
>> @@ -77,7 +77,11 @@ static void abort(struct net_device *dev
>>  static void hard_stop(struct net_device *dev);
>>  static void enable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev);
>>  static void disable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev);
>> -static int gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pci, int port_num);
>> +static int __devinit gt96100_probe(struct pci_dev *,
>> +        const struct pci_device_id *);
>> +static void __devexit gt96100_remove(struct pci_dev *);
>> +static int gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *, int);
>> +static void gt96100_remove1(struct gt96100_if_t *);
>>  static void reset_tx(struct net_device *dev);
>>  static void reset_rx(struct net_device *dev);
>>  static int gt96100_check_tx_consistent(struct gt96100_private *gp);
>> @@ -600,57 +604,93 @@ disable_ether_irq(struct net_device *dev
>>      GT96100ETH_WRITE(gp, GT96100_ETH_INT_MASK, 0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct pci_device_id gt96100_pci_tbl[] = {
>> +    { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100) },
>> +    { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100A) },
>> +    { 0 }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, gt96100_pci_tbl);
>>  
>> -/*
>> - * Init GT96100 ethernet controller driver
>> - */
>> -static int gt96100_init_module(void)
>> +static struct pci_driver gt96100_driver = {
>> +    .name        = "isicom",
>> +    .id_table    = gt96100_pci_tbl,
>> +    .probe        = gt96100_probe,
>> +    .remove        = __devexit_p(gt96100_remove)
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __devinit gt96100_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> +        const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>  {
>> -    struct pci_dev *pci;
>> -    int i, retval=0;
>> -    u32 cpuConfig;
>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs;
>> +    unsigned int i, j;
>> +    int retval;
>>  
>> -    /*
>> -     * Stupid probe because this really isn't a PCI device
>> -     */
>> -    if (!(pci = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
>> -                                PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100, NULL)) &&
>> -        !(pci = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL,
>> -                            PCI_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_GT96100A, NULL))) {
>> -        printk(KERN_ERR __FILE__ ": GT96100 not found!\n");
>> +    if (GT96100_READ(GT96100_CPU_INTERF_CONFIG) & (1 << 12)) {
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "must be in Big Endian mode!\n");
>>          return -ENODEV;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    cpuConfig = GT96100_READ(GT96100_CPU_INTERF_CONFIG);
>> -    if (cpuConfig & (1<<12)) {
>> -        printk(KERN_ERR __FILE__
>> -               ": must be in Big Endian mode!\n");
>> -        return -ENODEV;
> 
> Please don't include silly and unnecessary pseudo-optimizations like
> eliminating the cpuConfig variable.  The maintainer may have felt it was
> more readable in its original form (as do I).
Ok.
> 
> 
>> +    gtifs = kmalloc(sizeof(gt96100_iflist), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (gtifs == NULL) {
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to alloc ifs\n");
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +    }
> 
> the kmalloc should go before we start touching the hardware.
Sure.
> 
> 
>> +    memcpy(gtifs, &gt96100_iflist, sizeof(gt96100_iflist));
>> +
>> +    pci_set_drvdata(pdev,gtifs);
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
>> +        retval = gt96100_probe1(pdev, i);
>> +        if (retval)
>> +            goto unprobe;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    for (i=0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++)
>> -        retval |= gt96100_probe1(pci, i);
>> +    return 0;
>> +unprobe:
>> +    for (j = i; j > 0; j--) {
>> +        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[j - 1];
>> +        gt96100_remove1(gtif);
>> +    }
>> +    kfree(gtifs);
> 
> upon failure, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL
What is the purpose of setting this to NULL, other drivers don't do that too?
> 
> 
>> -static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pci, int port_num)
>> +static void __devexit gt96100_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
>> +        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[i];
>> +        gt96100_remove1(gtif);
>> +    }
>> +    kfree(gtifs);
> 
> on exit, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL
...
> 
> 
>> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>>  {
>>      struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
>> -    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>>      int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>>      u32 phyAD;
>> -    int retval;
>> +    int retval = -ENOMEM;
>>      unsigned char chip_rev;
>>      struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>           if (gtif->irq < 0) {
>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
>> -              __FUNCTION__);
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>>          return -ENODEV;
>>      }
>> +
>> +    retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>> +    if (retval) {
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
>> +        return retval;
>> +    }
> 
> bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded hardware
I do not understand too much, did you mean something like this:
} else
	dev_info(..., "pci device is enabled now\n");
or?
> 
> bug #2:  you call pci_enable_device() multiple times for the same PCI
> device
It's not a bug, but you are right, it'll go to the _probe() section.
> 
> 
>> -    pci_read_config_byte(pci, PCI_REVISION_ID, &chip_rev);
>> +    pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &chip_rev);
>>  
>>      if (chip_rev >= REV_GT96100A_1) {
>>          phyAD = GT96100_READ(GT96100_ETH_PHY_ADDR_REG);
>> @@ -669,12 +709,12 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct      //
>> probe for the external PHY
>>      if ((phy_id1 = read_MII(phy_addr, 2)) <= 0 ||
>>          (phy_id2 = read_MII(phy_addr, 3)) <= 0) {
>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no PHY found on MII%d\n", __FUNCTION__,
>> port_num);
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no PHY found on MII%d\n", port_num);
>>          return -ENODEV;
>>      }
>>     
>>      if (!request_region(gtif->iobase, GT96100_ETH_IO_SIZE,
>> "GT96100ETH")) {
>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: request_region failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_region failed\n");
>>          return -EBUSY;
>>      }
>>  
>> @@ -689,7 +729,7 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct     
>> dev->irq = gtif->irq;
>>  
>>      if ((retval = parse_mac_addr(dev, gtif->mac_str))) {
>> -        err("%s: MAC address parse failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MAC address parse failed\n");
>>          retval = -EINVAL;
>>          goto out1;
>>      }
>> @@ -704,12 +744,15 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct     
>> gp->phy_addr = phy_addr;
>>      gp->chip_rev = chip_rev;
>>  
>> -    info("%s found at 0x%x, irq %d\n",
>> -         chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gtif->iobase, gtif->irq);
>> +    dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s found at 0x%x, irq %d\n",
>> +            chip_name(gp->chip_rev), gtif->iobase, gtif->irq);
>>      dump_hw_addr(0, dev, "%s: HW Address ", __FUNCTION__,
>> dev->dev_addr);
>> -    info("%s chip revision=%d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
>> gp->chip_rev);
>> -    info("%s ethernet port %d\n", chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
>> gp->port_num);
>> -    info("external PHY ID1=0x%04x, ID2=0x%04x\n", phy_id1, phy_id2);
>> +    dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s chip revision=%d\n",
>> chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
>> +            gp->chip_rev);
>> +    dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s ethernet port %d\n",
>> chip_name(gp->chip_rev),
>> +            gp->port_num);
>> +    dev_info(&pdev->dev, "external PHY ID1=0x%04x, ID2=0x%04x\n",
>> phy_id1,
>> +            phy_id2);
>>  
>>      // Allocate Rx and Tx descriptor rings
>>      if (gp->rx_ring == NULL) {
>> @@ -737,8 +780,8 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct          }
>>      }
>>      -    dbg(3, "%s: rx_ring=%p, tx_ring=%p\n", __FUNCTION__,
>> -        gp->rx_ring, gp->tx_ring);
>> +    dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "rx_ring=%p, tx_ring=%p\n", gp->rx_ring,
>> +            gp->tx_ring);
>>  
>>      // Allocate Rx Hash Table
>>      if (gp->hash_table == NULL) {
>> @@ -750,7 +793,7 @@ static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct          }
>>      }
>>      -    dbg(3, "%s: hash=%p\n", __FUNCTION__, gp->hash_table);
>> +    dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "hash=%p\n", gp->hash_table);
>>  
>>      spin_lock_init(&gp->lock);
>>      @@ -781,10 +824,24 @@ out1:
>>  out:
>>      release_region(gtif->iobase, GT96100_ETH_IO_SIZE);
>>  
>> -    err("%s failed.  Returns %d\n", __FUNCTION__, retval);
>> +    dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed.  Returns %d\n", __FUNCTION__,
>> retval);
>>      return retval;
> 
> all this dev_foo() stuff creates patch noise.  It should be in a
> separate patch.
Will cut off.
> 
> 
>> +static void gt96100_remove1(struct gt96100_if_t *gtif)
>> +{
>> +    if (gtif->dev != NULL) {
> 
> unindent by doing
> 
>     if (gtif->dev == NULL)
>         return;
> 
>     ...
Ok.
> 
> 
>> +        struct gt96100_private *gp = netdev_priv(gtif->dev);
>> +        unregister_netdev(gtif->dev);
>> +        dmafree(RX_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, gp->hash_table_dma);
>> +        dmafree(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE, gp->rx_buff);
>> +        dmafree(sizeof(gt96100_rd_t) * RX_RING_SIZE
>> +            + sizeof(gt96100_td_t) * TX_RING_SIZE,
>> +            gp->rx_ring);
>> +        free_netdev(gtif->dev);
>> +        release_region(gtif->iobase, gp->io_size);
> 
> shouldn't this be using pci_request_regions() / pci_release_regions() ?
There are GT96100_ETH{0,1}_BASEs instead of bars, I have no idea, which bar
correspond to each base.
Maybe if there is somebody, who can lspci -xxx, so that we can compare it (if
the address is pci config space at all).
> 
> 
>>  static void
>>  reset_tx(struct net_device *dev)
>> @@ -1516,24 +1573,14 @@ gt96100_get_stats(struct net_device *dev
>>      return &gp->stats;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void gt96100_cleanup_module(void)
>> +static int __init gt96100_init_module(void)
>>  {
>> -    int i;
>> -    for (i=0; i<NUM_INTERFACES; i++) {
>> -        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[i];
>> -        if (gtif->dev != NULL) {
>> -            struct gt96100_private *gp = (struct gt96100_private *)
>> -                netdev_priv(gtif->dev);
>> -            unregister_netdev(gtif->dev);
>> -            dmafree(RX_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, gp->hash_table_dma);
>> -            dmafree(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE, gp->rx_buff);
>> -            dmafree(sizeof(gt96100_rd_t) * RX_RING_SIZE
>> -                + sizeof(gt96100_td_t) * TX_RING_SIZE,
>> -                gp->rx_ring);
>> -            free_netdev(gtif->dev);
>> -            release_region(gtif->iobase, gp->io_size);
>> -        }
>> -    }
>> +    return pci_register_driver(&gt96100_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit gt96100_cleanup_module(void)
>> +{
>> +    pci_unregister_driver(&gt96100_driver);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int __init gt96100_setup(char *options)
>>
>>
> 
> 

Thanks for your comments.

-- 
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
> Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>>>  {
>>>      struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
>>> -    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>>>      int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>>>      u32 phyAD;
>>> -    int retval;
>>> +    int retval = -ENOMEM;
>>>      unsigned char chip_rev;
>>>      struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>>           if (gtif->irq < 0) {
>>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
>>> -              __FUNCTION__);
>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>>>          return -ENODEV;
>>>      }
>>> +
>>> +    retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>>> +    if (retval) {
>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
>>> +        return retval;
>>> +    }
>> bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded hardware
> I do not understand too much, did you mean something like this:
> } else
> 	dev_info(..., "pci device is enabled now\n");
> or?
Or..., aha, I got it now. How can I confirm?

thnaks,
-- 
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jeff Garzik]

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
>> Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>>>>  {
>>>>      struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
>>>> -    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
>>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>>>>      int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>>>>      u32 phyAD;
>>>> -    int retval;
>>>> +    int retval = -ENOMEM;
>>>>      unsigned char chip_rev;
>>>>      struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>>>           if (gtif->irq < 0) {
>>>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
>>>> -              __FUNCTION__);
>>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>>>>          return -ENODEV;
>>>>      }
>>>> +
>>>> +    retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>>>> +    if (retval) {
>>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
>>>> +        return retval;
>>>> +    }
>>> bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded hardware
>> I do not understand too much, did you mean something like this:
>> } else
>> 	dev_info(..., "pci device is enabled now\n");
>> or?
> Or..., aha, I got it now. How can I confirm?

Asking the maintainer would be a good first step.

	Jeff

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

Cc: stevel@mvista.com

Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
>>> Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
>>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>>> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>      struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
>>>>> -    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
>>>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>>>>>      int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>>>>>      u32 phyAD;
>>>>> -    int retval;
>>>>> +    int retval = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>      unsigned char chip_rev;
>>>>>      struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>>>>           if (gtif->irq < 0) {
>>>>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
>>>>> -              __FUNCTION__);
>>>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>>>>>          return -ENODEV;
>>>>>      }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>>>>> +    if (retval) {
>>>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
>>>>> +        return retval;
>>>>> +    }
>>>> bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded
>>>> hardware
>>> I do not understand too much, did you mean something like this:
>>> } else
>>>     dev_info(..., "pci device is enabled now\n");
>>> or?
>> Or..., aha, I got it now. How can I confirm?
> 
> Asking the maintainer would be a good first step.
Hello,

can you confirm, if calling pci_enable_device is safe for this (gt96100eth) device?

thanks,
-- 
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jeff Garzik]

Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> +unprobe:
>>> +    for (j = i; j > 0; j--) {
>>> +        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[j - 1];
>>> +        gt96100_remove1(gtif);
>>> +    }
>>> +    kfree(gtifs);
>> upon failure, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL
> What is the purpose of setting this to NULL, other drivers don't do that too?

A simple grep(1) shows well over 300 cases that do this.

And it's just logical:  don't leave a pointer hanging around, after it 
has been kfree'd.


>>> +        struct gt96100_private *gp = netdev_priv(gtif->dev);
>>> +        unregister_netdev(gtif->dev);
>>> +        dmafree(RX_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, gp->hash_table_dma);
>>> +        dmafree(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE, gp->rx_buff);
>>> +        dmafree(sizeof(gt96100_rd_t) * RX_RING_SIZE
>>> +            + sizeof(gt96100_td_t) * TX_RING_SIZE,
>>> +            gp->rx_ring);
>>> +        free_netdev(gtif->dev);
>>> +        release_region(gtif->iobase, gp->io_size);
>> shouldn't this be using pci_request_regions() / pci_release_regions() ?
> There are GT96100_ETH{0,1}_BASEs instead of bars, 

Indeed.  I stand corrected.

	Jeff

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> +unprobe:
>>>> +    for (j = i; j > 0; j--) {
>>>> +        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[j - 1];
>>>> +        gt96100_remove1(gtif);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    kfree(gtifs);
>>> upon failure, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL
>> What is the purpose of setting this to NULL, other drivers don't do
>> that too?
> 
> A simple grep(1) shows well over 300 cases that do this.
But also shows the latter case: some of them do not have pci_dev_setdrv([^,]*,
NULL) -- it finds only one occurence of that function (that set the value).
> 
> And it's just logical:  don't leave a pointer hanging around, after it
> has been kfree'd.
Seems logical. Will do it.

thanks,
-- 
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jeff Garzik]

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>>> +unprobe:
>>>>> +    for (j = i; j > 0; j--) {
>>>>> +        struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[j - 1];
>>>>> +        gt96100_remove1(gtif);
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +    kfree(gtifs);
>>>> upon failure, you fail to set drvdata back to NULL
>>> What is the purpose of setting this to NULL, other drivers don't do
>>> that too?
>> A simple grep(1) shows well over 300 cases that do this.
> But also shows the latter case: some of them do not have pci_dev_setdrv([^,]*,
> NULL) -- it finds only one occurence of that function (that set the value).

There are hundreds of occurrences of pci_set_drvdata(dev, NULL), and 
many more for non-PCI functions such as dev_set_drvdata() that do the same.

	Jeff

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
> Jeff Garzik napsal(a):
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> +static int __init gt96100_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int port_num)
>>>  {
>>>      struct gt96100_private *gp = NULL;
>>> -    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gt96100_iflist[port_num];
>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtifs = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +    struct gt96100_if_t *gtif = &gtifs[port_num];
>>>      int phy_addr, phy_id1, phy_id2;
>>>      u32 phyAD;
>>> -    int retval;
>>> +    int retval = -ENOMEM;
>>>      unsigned char chip_rev;
>>>      struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>>           if (gtif->irq < 0) {
>>> -        printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq unknown - probing not supported\n",
>>> -              __FUNCTION__);
>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq unknown - probing not supported\n");
>>>          return -ENODEV;
>>>      }
>>> +
>>> +    retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>>> +    if (retval) {
>>> +        dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot enable pci device\n");
>>> +        return retval;
>>> +    }
>> bug #1:  please confirm pci_enable_device() is OK on this embedded hardware
> I do not understand too much, did you mean something like this:
> } else
> 	dev_info(..., "pci device is enabled now\n");
> or?
Or..., aha, I got it now. How can I confirm?

thnaks,
-- 
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Ralf Baechle]

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:52:49PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >gt96100eth use pci probing
> >
> >Convert pci_find_device to pci probing. Use dev_* macros for printing.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>

The GT-96100 is not a PCI device but a system controller.  The driver
just checkes for the PCI ID to ensure it is not by accident being loaded
on the wrong type of system.  Which of course is suspect.  If anything it
should become a platform device.

  Ralf

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pci: gt96100eth use pci probing

[Jiri Slaby]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralf Baechle napsal(a):
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:52:49PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> gt96100eth use pci probing
>>>
>>> Convert pci_find_device to pci probing. Use dev_* macros for printing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
> 
> The GT-96100 is not a PCI device but a system controller.  The driver
> just checkes for the PCI ID to ensure it is not by accident being loaded
> on the wrong type of system.  Which of course is suspect.  If anything it
> should become a platform device.
Ooops. Ok, do you all agree to just remove pci_find_device() and add
pci_get_device() + pci_dev_put()? (And maybe next patch with dev_* macros).

regards,
- --
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEdhUaMsxVwznUen4RAllLAJsEs5QVVkHojpljkShQRu28p53n6wCgsCkA
/SuFkkLFIsC7ToR6FeGGhAE=
=akyh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----