public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site
@ 2006-05-24  9:03 Michael Opdenacker
  2006-05-27 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Opdenacker @ 2006-05-24  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hello,

As the number of such sites is still very small, I set up a new LXR 
site: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/

At last, it's an up to date site with an easy to remember URL.

Other LXR sites can be found on 
http://free-electrons.com/community/kernel/lxr . Let me know if you know 
other such sites!

    Cheers,

    Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1000 pages!)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site
  2006-05-24  9:03 New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site Michael Opdenacker
@ 2006-05-27 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
  2006-05-29  8:50   ` Michael Opdenacker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2006-05-27 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Opdenacker; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

2006/5/24, Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com>:
> Hello,
>
> As the number of such sites is still very small, I set up a new LXR
> site: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/
>

You obviously use a quite recent lxr version. Which one? I have a
number of projects still referenced via lxr 0.3.1 because it's easy to
maintain and does not require a bunch of additional software. Maybe I
should really update...

Recently I started to experiment with OpenGrok
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok), also for kernel
trees. Quite easy to handle, and I was enthusiastic about it first.
But it is not yet as robust as the lxr behind your site (reference
links are occasionally missing in the code), it's history mechanism is
not comparable to lxr's versioning, and arch-switching is lacking.

Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site
  2006-05-27 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2006-05-29  8:50   ` Michael Opdenacker
  2006-05-29  8:59     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Opdenacker @ 2006-05-29  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hello Jan,

> You obviously use a quite recent lxr version. Which one? I have a
> number of projects still referenced via lxr 0.3.1 because it's easy to
> maintain and does not require a bunch of additional software. Maybe I
> should really update...

/Right! I am using the latest version (0.9.5)./

>
> Recently I started to experiment with OpenGrok
> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok), also for kernel
> trees. Quite easy to handle, and I was enthusiastic about it first.
> But it is not yet as robust as the lxr behind your site (reference
> links are occasionally missing in the code), it's history mechanism is
> not comparable to lxr's versioning, and arch-switching is lacking.

Thanks for the tip! I will keep an eye on this new tool too...

    Cheers,

    Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1000 pages!)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site
  2006-05-29  8:50   ` Michael Opdenacker
@ 2006-05-29  8:59     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2006-05-29  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Opdenacker; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1130 bytes --]

On Mon, 2006-05-29 10:50:17 +0200, Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >Recently I started to experiment with OpenGrok
> >(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok), also for kernel
> >trees. Quite easy to handle, and I was enthusiastic about it first.
> >But it is not yet as robust as the lxr behind your site (reference
> >links are occasionally missing in the code), it's history mechanism is
> >not comparable to lxr's versioning, and arch-switching is lacking.
> 
> Thanks for the tip! I will keep an eye on this new tool too...

Seems to be highly interwoven mit the used SCM system and thus does
also do some tasks like searching in the commit messages etc., so its
scope is a bit different than that of LXR.  Also, it's not GPLed.

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger"  | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-29  8:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-24  9:03 New Linux Cross Reference (LXR) site Michael Opdenacker
2006-05-27 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-05-29  8:50   ` Michael Opdenacker
2006-05-29  8:59     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox