Re: [PATCH] klibc

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
>>>> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
>>>> +	!defined(__powerpc64__)
>>> Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
>> _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some 
>> 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though.  I will look at this later today.
>>
>> 	-hpa
> 
> indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.
> 
> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)
> 
> is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.
> 

__arch64__ is ugly; it doesn't say it's a sparc thing.  I have added 
-D__sparc_v9__ to the sparc64 MCONFIG file, so I think that's fine.

Perhaps the right thing to do is to make this an archconfig.h configurable.

	-hpa