From: Heiko Gerstung <heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Backport of a 2.6.x USB driver to 2.4.32 - help needed
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44854F74.50406@meinberg.de> (raw)
Hi!
Short Version (tm): I try to backport a USB driver (rtl8150.c) from
2.6.15.x to 2.4.32 and have no idea how to substitue two functions:
in_atomic() and schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() ... I really would
appreciate any help, because I am no kernel hacker at all ...
Long Version (tm):
I have problems backporting a USB driver from 2.6.15.x to 2.4.32 and I
am at a total loss because I am not really a device driver hacker and it
seems that the original author/maintainer is currently very busy and has
no chance to support me in this case (although his support so far was
excellent!).
I still fight with the driver for Realtek 8150 based USB-to-Ethernet
products (drivers/usb/net/rtl8150.c in 2.6.x kernels,
/drivers/usb/rtl8150.c in the 2.4 kernel tree).
Under 2.4.32 this driver crashes (kernel panic) when I try to enslave a
network interface handled by it, with a 2.6 kernel there is no such
problem. Unfortunately I cannot go ahead with a 2.6 kernel at the
moment, because it lacks a properly running PPS support.
I therefore backported the 2.6.x driver to compile cleanly under 2.4.32
and it still crashes when I try to enslave such an interface in miimon
mode. I think there is a difference in the way the bonding module checks
the MII link status of the device. The maintainer of the driver
modified a few things for me in order to address this problem ("it
happens because get/set_registers() are called with no process
context"), but he was only able to modify the 2.6.x driver for me.
I started to backport the modified version, but it seems that I ran into
dependency hell because I get the following two missing functions
reported when I try to compile the backported module:
rtl8150.c: In Funktion »rtl8150_get_settings«:
rtl8150.c:790: Warnung: implicit declaration of function `in_atomic'
rtl8150.c: In Funktion »rtl8150_thread«:
rtl8150.c:857: Warnung: implicit declaration of function
`schedule_timeout_uninterruptible'
Now I would need help in finding a way to substitute the two missing
functions in a 2.4 kernel environment and I desperately hope that
someone sees my dilemma and can help me somehow...
Anyway, thank you for spending the time to at least read this post (and
thanks a lot if you could spend a few cycles on thinking about a
possible solution!).
Kind regards,
Heiko
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*MEINBERG Funkuhren GmbH & Co. KG*
Auf der Landwehr 22
D-31812 Bad Pyrmont, Germany
Tel.: ++49 (0)5281 9309-25
Fax: ++49 (0)5281 9309-30
eMail: heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de <mailto:heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de>
Internet: www.meinberg.de <http://www.meinberg.de/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meinberg radio clocks: 25 years of accurate time worldwide
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-06 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-06 9:48 Heiko Gerstung [this message]
2006-06-06 11:23 ` Backport of a 2.6.x USB driver to 2.4.32 - help needed Jesper Juhl
2006-06-06 11:41 ` Heiko Gerstung
2006-06-06 14:43 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-06-06 14:48 ` Heiko Gerstung
2006-06-06 14:58 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-06-06 18:30 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-06-07 8:04 ` Jesper Juhl
[not found] <6kGwd-1tt-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6kHVe-3Hs-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-06-07 0:16 ` Robert Hancock
2006-06-07 6:56 ` Heiko Gerstung
[not found] <mailman.1149588721.11795.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2006-06-09 23:26 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-06-14 13:56 ` Heiko Gerstung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44854F74.50406@meinberg.de \
--to=heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox