From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
ak@suse.de, shaohua.li@intel.com, miles.lane@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:27:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44860F7B.2040105@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060606162201.f0f9f308.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> All the above applies to suspend-to-disk. I don't know if suspend-to-RAM
> shuts down the APs.
>
I'm using suspend-to-mem and it looks like its unplugging/replugging all
the CPUs.
The part of the question I don't quite understand is why this is
considered per-CPU state? Surely NMI-watchdog is a system-wide thing?
Or does this also tie into other uses of the performance registers which
may be set per-CPU?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-06 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 22:51 [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-04 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-05 7:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 7:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 7:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-05 7:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05 8:35 ` Miles Lane
2006-06-06 6:44 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-06 14:17 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 14:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 21:45 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:05 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-06-06 23:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:42 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-08 20:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 0:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-07 0:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 0:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 0:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 0:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-08 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-08 12:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:55 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 0:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 0:42 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 0:50 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07 3:29 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-06-07 9:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-08 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 16:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-06 16:51 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 2:49 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 16:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 17:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 17:50 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 18:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44860F7B.2040105@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).