linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	ak@suse.de, shaohua.li@intel.com, miles.lane@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:56:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44862434.2070805@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606071034.03228.ncunningham@linuxmail.org>

Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> In general, you're right because we don't have perfect hardware hotplugging 
> yet. But cpu hotplugging is one area we do have, so it should work.
Well, it seems to me the general problem is generating the proper 
hotplug events.  If you actually pull, say, a USB device, the usb 
subsystem will tell you about it as it happens.  But if you can suspend 
the machine and then arbitrarily rearrange the hardware, then on resume 
you'd have to go over the current hardware state and compare it to the 
pre-suspend state and generate all those events.  Or I guess you could 
just generate unplug events for everything at suspend and re-plug 
anything you find on resume.  Sounds pretty heavyweight though.

    J


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-07  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-02 22:51 [2.6.17-rc5-mm2] crash when doing second suspend: BUG in arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c:174 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-04 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-05  7:21   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05  7:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05  7:48   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-05  7:59     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-05  8:35     ` Miles Lane
2006-06-06  6:44       ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-06 14:17         ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 14:18           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 21:45             ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 22:15               ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:05                 ` Don Zickus
2006-06-06 23:22                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 23:27                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-06 23:32                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:42                       ` Don Zickus
2006-06-08 20:11                         ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:38                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:06                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07  0:13                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:24                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-07  0:29                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07  0:31                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:33                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07  0:40                               ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:26                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07  0:33                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:56                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-06-08 20:13                         ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-08 12:45                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 23:34                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 23:55                     ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07  0:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07  0:05                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  0:42                         ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07  0:50                           ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-07  3:29                             ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-06-07  9:55                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-06-08 20:27                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-06 16:23         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-06 16:51           ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07  2:49           ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 16:33             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 17:07             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-07 17:50               ` Don Zickus
2006-06-07 18:53                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44862434.2070805@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).