From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750868AbWFGUgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:36:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751183AbWFGUgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:36:32 -0400 Received: from 85.8.24.16.se.wasadata.net ([85.8.24.16]:57740 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbWFGUgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:36:32 -0400 Message-ID: <448738CD.8030907@drzeus.cx> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 22:36:29 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Reimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2GB MMC/SD cards References: <447AFE7A.3070401@drzeus.cx> <20060603141548.GA31182@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4481FB80.40709@drzeus.cx> <4484B5AE.8060404@drzeus.cx> <44869794.9080906@drzeus.cx> <20060607165837.GE13165@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060607165837.GE13165@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > I wonder if all 2GB cards are >= v4.2 of the spec? If so, we could > do what would appear correct to both the spec and reality, and select > 512 byte blocksizes irrespective if they conform to v4.2 or later. > > This might only be a clarification as earlier specs apparently states that all cards must have the block size set to 512 bytes at init. As people seem to have been running their own hacks without any problems, we probably should just change it and see if there's any fallout. Live dangerous for a bit. ;) Rgds Pierre