Re: [PATCH] ignore smp_locks section warnings from init/exit code

Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-12T02:49:39Z

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:29:58 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:17:40PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > gdb tells me:
> > > (gdb) x/4xa 0x6027b748
> > > 0x6027b748 <stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5>: 0x0 0x0
> > > 0x6027b758 <completed.6111+8>: 0x0 0x0
> > >
> > > So, with stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5 at 0x6027b748 and completed.6111 at
> > > 0x6027b750 - right next to each other - there would seem to be nothing
> > > between them to reference anything.
> >
> > gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111>, not 0x6027b750 as you
> > wrote, so there's 8 more bytes for gunk there. ;)
> > Anyway, since I can't build UML, I'm willing to look at the
>
> gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111+8>, making
> completed.6111 = 0x6027b750, leaving 0 bytes for gunk.

um. ack.

---
~Randy