Re: [PATCH] ignore smp_locks section warnings from init/exit code

Jeff Dike
2006-06-12T02:30:19Z

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:17:40PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > gdb tells me:
> > (gdb) x/4xa 0x6027b748
> > 0x6027b748 <stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5>: 0x0 0x0
> > 0x6027b758 <completed.6111+8>: 0x0 0x0
> >
> > So, with stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5 at 0x6027b748 and completed.6111 at
> > 0x6027b750 - right next to each other - there would seem to be nothing
> > between them to reference anything.
>
> gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111>, not 0x6027b750 as you
> wrote, so there's 8 more bytes for gunk there. ;)
> Anyway, since I can't build UML, I'm willing to look at the

gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111+8>, making
completed.6111 = 0x6027b750, leaving 0 bytes for gunk.

Jeff