From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: cacheline alignment and per-cpu data
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:40:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44899681.6070003@nortel.com> (raw)
Someone asked me a question that I couldn't answer, so I thought I'd
pass it on to here.
Suppose I declare an array of a struct type, where the size of the
struct is not a multiple of the cacheline size. Each element in the
array is used by a different cpu.
If I understand it, this would mean that the last member in the data
belonging to one cpu shares a cacheline with the first member in the
data belonging to the next cpu.
Will this cause cacheline pingpong? If I do this sort of thing do I
need to ensure that the struct is a multiple of cacheline size (or
specify cacheline alignement)?
Thanks,
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 15:40 Chris Friesen [this message]
2006-06-09 15:56 ` cacheline alignment and per-cpu data Chase Venters
2006-06-12 9:17 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44899681.6070003@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox