public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3: bad unlock ordering (reiser4?)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:36:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4489E9D8.6090002@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605065444.GA27445@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:

>        if (atomic_read(&node->d_count) != 0) {
>                return 0;
>        }
>
>why the braces, when on the next line it's not done:
>
>        if (blocknr_is_fake(jnode_get_block(node)))
>                return 0;
>
>it looks quite inconsistent.
>
I have a (roughly adhered to) rule that I don't hassle programmers much
about the style of any code that I can easily read.  I truly do not care
where the braces are, I care if the comments and variable names are well
done.  So that is why, and yes, I know I am an unusual manager on this
point.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-09 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-04 12:04 2.6.17-rc5-mm3: bad unlock ordering (reiser4?) Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-04 14:00 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-04 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-04 20:56   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-06-04 21:34     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-04 22:03       ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-05  2:46         ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-05  6:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05  7:37           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 11:22             ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-06-05 12:50               ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 23:56                 ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-05  7:58           ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-05  8:12             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05  9:00               ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-09 21:39               ` Hans Reiser
2006-06-09 21:36           ` Hans Reiser [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4489E9D8.6090002@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=barryn@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox