From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932101AbWFKErF (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:47:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932556AbWFKErF (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:47:05 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:38745 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932101AbWFKErE (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:47:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Men6yphFgr72a1Kvi9aRwkCeqGzijg0wv5Rz0tClsZmIWVvGxj9JIS4wMb8qa5pqaU7SuJ3hoMByvkL8P2N5EoZHE7BnZLpa+ByGirOdbkgIm7HxMIR7YCo7v0BArvpTVMfozoRc32waacHbDgIoYlxtCJpcpceICF7ZKTOhmdI= Message-ID: <448BA03B.6060800@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 12:46:51 +0800 From: "Antonino A. Daplas" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Smirl CC: Andrew Morton , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Kernel Development , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] VT binding: Add new doc file describing the feature References: <44893407.4020507@gmail.com> <448AC8BE.7090202@gmail.com> <9e4733910606100916r74615af8i34d37f323414034c@mail.gmail.com> <448B38F8.2000402@gmail.com> <9e4733910606101644j79b3d8a5ud7431564f4f42c7f@mail.gmail.com> <448B61F9.4060507@gmail.com> <9e4733910606101749r77d72a56mbcf6fb3505eb1de0@mail.gmail.com> <448B6ED3.5060408@gmail.com> <9e4733910606101905y6bfdff4bo3c1b1a2126d02b26@mail.gmail.com> <448B8818.1010303@gmail.com> <9e4733910606102027o8438d55webf938dfc8495ea8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910606102027o8438d55webf938dfc8495ea8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jon Smirl wrote: > On 6/10/06, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: >> My point is: 'Multiple active drivers feature' is a natural consequence >> of the evolution of the code, but the only way to take advantage of it >> is if we provide a means for the user to use it. And we are not >> providing the means. Maybe you're misunderstanding me. When I say "we are not providing the means", I mean "we are definitely not going to provide the means", NOT, "so we should be providing the means". Tony