From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750737AbWFKRbd (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:31:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750741AbWFKRbd (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:31:33 -0400 Received: from 8.ctyme.com ([69.50.231.8]:17339 "EHLO darwin.ctyme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750737AbWFKRbc (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:31:32 -0400 Message-ID: <448C536F.9070006@perkel.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:31:27 -0700 From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matti Aarnio CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While I support your desire to get rid of spam, SPF doesn't work. It's hopelessly broken and it needs to die in favor of some real solution. I'm in the spam filtering business http://www.junkemailfilter.com and I tried hard to get anything useful out of this technology and it's just plain useless.