From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932189AbWFMUL7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932205AbWFMUL7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:59 -0400 Received: from fmr18.intel.com ([134.134.136.17]:39624 "EHLO orsfmr003.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932189AbWFMUL6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:58 -0400 Message-ID: <448F1BCE.50708@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:10:54 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Mohr CC: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] i386 usercopy.c opcode reordering (pipelining) References: <20060613195502.GE24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20060613195502.GE24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi all, > > this one wrote to register %0 and immediately right-shifted it, > so let's andl register %3 first for better parallelism (rrright?). have you benchmarked this? I would actually expect no difference since a reg-reg move is basically a thing for the register rename engine which then... well it's supposed to be near free like this.