Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-13T22:47:16Z

Daniel,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by
> definition there are none.

Well, being GPL compatible is not a requirement for an open source license.

IANAL, but last I checked, pure-BSD is not compatible with GPL (it actually
has to be dual-licensed BSD/GPL).