public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>
To: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:07:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44907A8E.1080308@myri.com> (raw)

Hi Arjan,

We have some machines here where MMCONFIG is disabled in 2.6.17 because
their MCFG area is not e820-reserved. It makes the extended PCI config
space unavailable to pci_read/write_config_foo(). I don't know if lots
of people out there use the extended config space, but at least we do in
our myri10ge driver.

What would you think of a patch implementing the following strategy:
1) if MMCONFIG works, always use it (no change)
2) if MMCONFIG is disabled and we are accessing the regular config
space, use direct conf (no change, should ensure that any machine will
still boot fine)
3) if MMCONFIG is disabled but we are accessing the _extended_ config
space, try mmconfig anyway since there's no other way to do it.

Actually, this problem seems to target nVidia chipsets, and we actually
know how to check this chipset's registers to be sure whether MMCONFIG
works. So it might be good to improve the current MMCONFIG disabling
code by adding some chipset-specific hacks (having nVidia and Intel
chipsets there may cover most of the cases). I don't think there's any
way to do that with PCI quirks. We might end up having these hacks in
the MMCONFIG initialization code.

Thanks,
Brice


             reply	other threads:[~2006-06-14 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-14 21:07 Brice Goglin [this message]
2006-06-14 21:09 ` [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820 Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15  1:45   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-15  1:57   ` Brice Goglin
2006-06-15  6:47     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-21 22:19       ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-21 22:32         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-22  0:15           ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-22  9:27             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-23  7:41               ` Rajesh Shah
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-15  8:41 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-15 13:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15 14:32   ` Barry Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44907A8E.1080308@myri.com \
    --to=brice@myri.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox