From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com" <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "ktkhai@parallels.com" <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"juri.lelli@gmail.com" <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
"pang.xunlei@linaro.org" <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>,
"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:58:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449191433253514@web6g.yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150601140839.852669281@infradead.org>
01.06.2015, 17:13, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>:
> In order to remove dropping rq->lock from the
> switched_{to,from}()/prio_changed() sched_class methods, run the
> balance callbacks after it.
>
> We need to remove dropping rq->lock because its buggy,
> suppose using sched_setattr()/sched_setscheduler() to change a running
> task from FIFO to OTHER.
>
> By the time we get to switched_from_rt() the task is already enqueued
> on the cfs runqueues. If switched_from_rt() does pull_rt_task() and
> drops rq->lock, load-balancing can come in and move our task @p to
> another rq.
>
> The subsequent switched_to_fair() still assumes @p is on @rq and bad
> things will happen.
>
> By using balance callbacks we delay the load-balancing operations
> {rt,dl}x{push,pull} until we've done all the important work and the
> task is fully set up.
>
> Furthermore, the balance callbacks do not know about @p, therefore
> they cannot get confused like this.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,11 @@ inline int task_curr(const struct task_s
> }
>
> /*
> - * Can drop rq->lock because from sched_class::switched_from() methods drop it.
> + * switched_from, switched_to and prio_changed must _NOT_ drop rq->lock,
> + * use the balance_callback list if you want balancing.
> + *
> + * this means any call to check_class_changed() must be followed by a call to
> + * balance_callback().
> */
> static inline void check_class_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> const struct sched_class *prev_class,
> @@ -1010,7 +1014,7 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(s
> if (prev_class != p->sched_class) {
> if (prev_class->switched_from)
> prev_class->switched_from(rq, p);
> - /* Possble rq->lock 'hole'. */
> +
But switched_from_dl()->cancel_dl_timer() still unlocks rq->lock.
It seems we should drop it (cancel_dl_timer) and move hrtimer_cancel()
from switched_from_dl() to finish_task_switch(). It will be executed
for all classes and completely take the functionality we implement
cancel_dl_timer() for.
> p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p);
> } else if (oldprio != p->prio || dl_task(p))
> p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 13:58 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 4:41 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2015-06-03 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 8:24 ` pang.xunlei
2015-06-03 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-05 7:13 ` pang.xunlei
2015-06-05 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Use replace normalize_task() with __sched_setscheduler() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 13:58 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2015-06-02 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 16:27 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 10:40 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03 10:42 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,rt: Convert switched_{from,to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched,dl: Convert switched_{from,to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 4:52 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2015-06-01 14:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: " Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 14:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-02 6:48 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449191433253514@web6g.yandex.ru \
--to=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox