From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031091AbWFOSud (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:50:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031093AbWFOSud (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:50:33 -0400 Received: from 85.8.24.16.se.wasadata.net ([85.8.24.16]:24206 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031091AbWFOSud (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:50:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4491ABF7.4090204@drzeus.cx> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:50:31 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: sdhci-devel@list.drzeus.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Sdhci-devel] PATCH: Fix 32bitism in SDHCI References: <1150385605.3490.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> <449191EE.2090309@drzeus.cx> <1150393058.3490.120.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1150393058.3490.120.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > I'd have thought that one was a "Duh whoops, fix it now" kind of > submission for 2.6.17 > > Yes and no. It's for a code path that's never supposed to be hit (and isn't except for hardware so broken it doesn't work anyway). So I figured I might as well send it in with the rest of the patches. I'm fine either way though. I'll just pop that patch from my set. Rgds Pierre