From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750805AbWFPJGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750766AbWFPJGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:06:54 -0400 Received: from mtagate5.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.138]:22814 "EHLO mtagate5.uk.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750732AbWFPJGx (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:06:53 -0400 Message-ID: <449274A3.5050304@fr.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:06:43 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: serue@us.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction References: <20060609210202.215291000@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Have you seen my previous work in this direction? > > I know I had a much much more complete implementation. The only part > I had not completed was iptables support and that was about a days > more work. No, I didn't see your work, is it possible to send me a pointer on it or to have a patchset of your code ?