From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751404AbWFPNpz (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:45:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751405AbWFPNpz (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:45:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52693 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404AbWFPNpy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:45:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4492B611.50000@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:45:53 -0400 From: Peter Staubach User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.4.1 (X11/20060420) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Janne Karhunen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs References: <200606151638.15792.Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> <200606151754.33384.Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> <44918545.2090002@redhat.com> <200606160925.51332.Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200606160925.51332.Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Janne Karhunen wrote: >On Thursday 15 June 2006 19:05, Peter Staubach wrote: > > > >>>Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be >>>considered as bug and not as a feature :/ >>> >>> >>Yes, I believe that this would be considered to be a bug... >> >> > >Looks that this is a vendor kernel issue, couldn't get it to >barf on mainline. Without any more knowledge of the extent >of the problem testcase attached. Given that you suffer from >the problem you should occasionally see files vanishing. > Although this is a little timing dependent, it mostly should work. How long does it need to run before failures will be seen? I have been running it for about half an hour and it seems to be operating as I expected. I would suggest reporting this issue to your vendor and see what they have to say. Thanx... ps