From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932202AbWFRMuu (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:50:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932203AbWFRMuu (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:50:50 -0400 Received: from fmr18.intel.com ([134.134.136.17]:23962 "EHLO orsfmr003.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202AbWFRMuu (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:50:50 -0400 Message-ID: <44954B9B.6070209@linux.intel.com> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:48:27 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> CC: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc6-mm2] x86: add NUMA to oops messages References: <200606180815_MC3-1-C2CC-41A5@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200606180815_MC3-1-C2CC-41A5@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> and putting half of .config into the oops doesn't seem >> like a good long term strategy. > > It's just this one thing; I can't think of anything else to add... > if it's compact I'd actually put the entire vermagic line there... it'll show compiler, preempt and a whole lot of other "distinctive" features