From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932773AbWFWBkq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:40:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932767AbWFWBkq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:40:46 -0400 Received: from munin.agotnes.com ([202.173.149.60]:31402 "EHLO mail.agotnes.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932766AbWFWBkp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:40:45 -0400 Message-ID: <449B4684.8030409@agotnes.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:40:20 +1000 From: Johny User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wedgwood CC: Sergio Monteiro Basto , "Randy.Dunlap" , kernel@agotnes.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, vsu@altlinux.ru Subject: Re: how I know if a interrupt is ioapic_edge_type or ioapic_level_type? [Was Re: [Fwd: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Fwd: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 - USB issues]] References: <4497DA3F.80302@agotnes.com> <20060620044003.4287426d.akpm@osdl.org> <4499245C.8040207@agotnes.com> <1150936606.2855.21.camel@localhost.portugal> <20060621174754.159bb1d0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1150938288.3221.2.camel@localhost.portugal> <20060621210817.74b6b2bc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1150977386.2859.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060622142902.5c8f8e67.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1151016398.3022.4.camel@localhost.portugal> <20060622225405.GA5840@tuatara.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20060622225405.GA5840@tuatara.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris, If you keep me posted on the patch when released (I'm not on the kernel list, too high volume for me) I'll be happy to give your patch a whirl on my test box against whichever kernel you patch. Your last point is real good, how DOES Windows figure it out? In saying that, without the VIA drivers I only have USB1.1 support on this motherboard... Again, happy to test some theories if you have some tests you'd like ran... Cheers, :)Johny Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > >> yap, in my opinion this function should back to > >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq); > > > this is *obviousyl* wrong, it should never have been merged like that > and there are reports and complaints this causes problems for some > people > > we should first attempt to get all the IDs (some are clearly missing > still, patch coming up to address that) and where that fails perhaps > have a kernel command-line parameter to be overly aggressive as a > stop-gap until we van figure out the proper solution > > i'd also like to figure out why the quirk is needed/fails when people > are using ACPI for interrupt routing as presumbly that must work as > windows relies on it