From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932437AbWFYScZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:32:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932438AbWFYScZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:32:25 -0400 Received: from h-66-166-126-70.lsanca54.covad.net ([66.166.126.70]:58572 "EHLO myri.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932437AbWFYScZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:32:25 -0400 Message-ID: <449ED4D2.7060808@ens-lyon.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:24:18 -0400 From: Brice Goglin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Thomas Voegtle , Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.22 References: <20060622201757.GZ22737@sequoia.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Voegtle wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Chris Wright wrote: > > >> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.16.22 kernel. >> The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below. >> > > > Perhaps I missed the discussion about it, but why is this not piped > through linux-kernel-announce? > > It isn't on kernel.org as well so it is hard to track it. > > By the way, Adrian, is there still a plan to maintain the 2.6.16.x branch for a long time? If so, it would definitely make sense to keep the latest 2.6.16.x on the kernel.org banner. Brice