From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161100AbWF0PN2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:13:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161103AbWF0PN2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:13:28 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:6534 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161098AbWF0PN0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:13:26 -0400 Message-ID: <44A14B14.6070900@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:13:24 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Slaby CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use dev_printk() in some net drivers References: <20060627145145.GA30053@havoc.gtf.org> <44A14A5F.3090607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44A14A5F.3090607@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.2 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jiri Slaby wrote: > Don't you consider to use s#dev_printk(KERN_ERR, #dev_err(# macro? Why, yes. I had forgotten about those, thanks. Jeff