From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161012AbWF1I6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:58:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161240AbWF1I6H (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:58:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.ciphirelabs.net ([217.72.114.64]:59307 "EHLO mx1.ciphirelabs.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161012AbWF1I6F (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:58:05 -0400 Message-ID: <44A24434.5020403@ciphirelabs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:56:20 +0200 From: Andreas Jellinghaus User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andreas Mohr , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm) References: <200606270147.16501.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <44A14D3D.8060003@wasp.net.au> <20060627154130.GA31351@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <20060627222234.GP29199@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060627222234.GP29199@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ciphire-Security: plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org swsusp does not work with swap files. suspend2 does. so this is an inprovement. improvements are usually merged, unless there is a reason not to. could the discussion focus on current technical reasons why it should not be merged? I somehow get the impression there are personal preferences or future development strategies, but neither looks like a current technical reason to me, and thus should not harm merging or not. Regards, Andreas