From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@bull.net>,
sho@tnes.nec.co.jp, cmm@us.ibm.com,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:10:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A417A3.80001@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060628202421.GL5318@schatzie.adilger.int>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2006 17:50 +0200, Johann Lombardi wrote:
>>ext2/ext3_dir_entry_2 has a 16-bit entry(rec_len) and it would overflow
>>with 64KB blocksize. This patch prevent from overflow by limiting
>>rec_len to 65532.
>
> Having a max rec_len of 65532 is rather unfortunate, since the dir
> blocks always need to filled with dir entries. 65536 - 65532 = 4, and
> the minimum ext3_dir_entry size is 8 bytes. I would instead make this
> maybe 64 bytes less so that there is room for a filename in the "tail"
> dir_entry.
Then why not introduce a little symmetry by making max rec_len 2**15 and
treat big directory blocks as an array of smaller ones? I dimly recall
the page-cache oriented Ext2 dir code already does this.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-28 11:52 [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow sho
2006-06-28 15:50 ` Johann Lombardi
2006-06-28 20:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 10:46 ` [Ext2-devel] [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_lenoverflow Takashi Sato
2006-06-29 16:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 18:10 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2006-06-29 20:27 ` [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 22:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-06-30 9:31 ` Johann Lombardi
2006-06-30 18:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-07-01 8:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-07-01 10:27 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-07-05 18:41 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A417A3.80001@google.com \
--to=phillips@google.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=johann.lombardi@bull.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox