From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched.h: increment TASK_COMM_LEN to 20 bytes
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:46:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A5FE17.1000607@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060630183744.310f3f0d.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> We do occasionally hit task_struct.comm[] truncation, when people use
>>> "too-long-a-name%d" for their kernel thread names. But we seem to manage.
>> It would be especially helpful if you want to name a task thread
>> the NAA IEEE Registered name format (16 chars, globally unique), for things
>> like FC, SAS, etc. This way you can identify the task thread with
>> the device bearing the NAA IEEE name.
>>
>> Currently just last character is cut off, since TASK_COMM_LEN is 15+1.
>>
>> I think incrementing it would be a good thing, plus other things
>> may want to represent 8 bytes as a character array to be the name
>> of a task thread.
>
> OK, that's a reason. Being able to map a kernel thread onto a particular
> device is useful.
But will it wind up this way, when the does-not-exist-yet-upstream code
appears?
I would think it would make more sense to increase the size of the key
task structure only when there are justified, merged users in the kernel.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-01 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 1:06 [PATCH] sched.h: increment TASK_COMM_LEN to 20 bytes Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 1:26 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 2:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01 4:46 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-01 4:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 17:00 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-07 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-09 0:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01 9:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-03 12:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-24 2:27 Albert Cahalan
2006-06-23 16:49 Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A5FE17.1000607@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox