From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932420AbWGBFNq (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:13:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932143AbWGBFNq (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:13:46 -0400 Received: from tornado.reub.net ([202.89.145.182]:61396 "EHLO tornado.reub.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932120AbWGBFNp (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:13:45 -0400 Message-ID: <44A7560B.3050000@reub.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:13:47 +1200 From: Reuben Farrelly User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20060701) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Grant Wilson Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4 References: <20060701033524.3c478698.akpm@osdl.org> <20060701181455.GA16412@aitel.hist.no> <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/07/2006 10:22 a.m., Andrew Morton wrote: > I assume this is still the broken-barriers bug. Thanks for all the help on > this, guys. More is to be asked for, I'm afraid. > > I've prepared a tree which is basically 2.6.17-mm5, only the git-scsi-misc > and git-libata-all trees have been omitted. It's at > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.17-mm5-no-sata-scsi.bz2 > > (That's a diff against 2.6.17) > > If that kernel works, then the next step is to test > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.17-mm5-no-scsi.bz2 > > which is 2.6.17-mm5 without git-scsi-misc, but with git-libata-all. Just for kicks, after testing those two trees (see previous email) I took my 2.6.17-mm5 without git-scsi-misc and then patched git-scsi-misc.patch back in, rebuilt and rebooted and noted that RAID broke again. Reverted the patch and it all worked. So I can conclude that definitely and reproduceably that's the one......... reuben