From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751441AbWGBRiw (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:38:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751442AbWGBRiw (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:38:52 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:32926 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbWGBRiv (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:38:51 -0400 Message-ID: <44A80471.1020406@zytor.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:37:53 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Miles Lane , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' References: <1151788673.3195.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151789342.3195.60.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151826131.3111.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151861523.3111.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1151861523.3111.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector >> patches go into Andrew's tree? > > long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel > (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it > work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad, > distros and security sensitive people can enable it always). > Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs -fstack-protector as appropriate. -hpa