From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964841AbWGBSFT (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964848AbWGBSFT (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:05:19 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:24253 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964841AbWGBSFR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:05:17 -0400 Message-ID: <44A80AB5.9060101@zytor.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:04:37 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Miles Lane , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' References: <1151788673.3195.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151789342.3195.60.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151826131.3111.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151861523.3111.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <44A80471.1020406@zytor.com> <1151862632.3111.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1151862632.3111.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> >> Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs > > -fno-stack-protector doesn't even exist afaics; simply because gcc has > this as a positive commandline option only.. You actively have to fight gcc's internals to make a boolean option positive only, and that's a good thing. The only reason it's possible at all are as a way to deal with multistate options. -hpa