From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Suspend to RAM regression tracked down
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:06:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A80B20.1090702@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151837268.5358.10.camel@idefix.homelinux.org>
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> A while ago, I reported a suspend to RAM regression (fail to resume). I
> have since then tracked down the regression to the changes between
> 2.6.12-rc5-git5 and 2.6.12-rc5-git6. On my laptop, I have only been able
> to reproduce the problem with the ondemand cpufreq governor, but I've
> head of another user with the same (Dell D600) laptop having problem
> with the userspace governor as well. All the details are actually
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6166 but it seems like it's
> being ignored. It's currently assigned to the ACPI category, but maybe
> it belongs to cpufreq? Anyone can help here?
>
There was a race in ondemand and conservative which made them lock up on
resume (possibly only on SMP systems though). There's a patch for that
in current -mm, but I suspect there's another problem (still haven't had
any time to track it down).
The workaround is to switch to one of the performance/powersave/user
governors just before suspend, and restore the governor on resume.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-02 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-02 10:47 Suspend to RAM regression tracked down Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-02 18:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2006-07-02 22:52 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-03 6:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-07-03 6:31 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-03 6:08 ` Jeff Chua
2006-07-07 11:25 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-07 16:21 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-07 22:48 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-08 6:23 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-08 22:55 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2006-07-09 3:21 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-09 5:28 ` Jean-Marc Valin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A80B20.1090702@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox