From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932218AbWGDNOP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:14:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932241AbWGDNOP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:14:15 -0400 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:32185 "EHLO watts.utsl.gen.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932209AbWGDNOO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: <44AA6994.5010202@vilain.net> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:13:56 +1200 From: Sam Vilain User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Andrey Savochkin , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Cedric Le Goater , hadi@cyberus.ca, Herbert Poetzl , Alexey Kuznetsov , viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, devel@openvz.org, dev@sw.ru, Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Greear , Dave Hansen , Alexey Kuznetsov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Russel Coker Subject: Re: strict isolation of net interfaces References: <20060627225213.GB2612@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <1151449973.24103.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060627234210.GA1598@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20060628133640.GB5088@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <1151502803.5203.101.camel@jzny2> <44A44124.5010602@vilain.net> <44A450D1.2030405@fr.ibm.com> <20060630023947.GA24726@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <44A49121.4050004@vilain.net> <20060703185350.A16826@castle.nmd.msu.ru> <44AA5F28.9040109@fr.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <44AA5F28.9040109@fr.ibm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > If it is ok for you, we can collaborate to merge the two solutions in > one. I will focus on layer 3 isolation and you on the layer 2. So, you're writing a LSM module or adapting the BSD Jail LSM, right? :) Sam.