From: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] Check root chipset no_msi flag instead of all parent busses flags
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:46:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD3062.9030601@myri.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060706153940.GA29981@colo.lackof.org>
Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:38:27AM -0400, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> Grant Grundler wrote:
>>
>>> I still don't want the generic PCI code to assume a "root"
>>> PCI Host bus controller was found after that loop.
>>>
>> If I am not mistaken, we can use the following code to check whether we
>> found a root chipset:
>> unsigned cap;
>> u16 val;
>> u8 ext_type;
>> cap = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>>
>
> That might work fine on x86 boxen where firmware fakes all devices
> to show up in PCI config space. That's not the case on many other
> architectures. My whole point was the pdev doesn't exist for
> a root chipset on those other arch's.
>
Right, and the whole point of this check is to detect this case: my
while loop cannot find a root chipset on these architectures since there
is no pci_dev. So the while loop will return another pci_dev, either the
device or another bridge. When we detect that this pci_dev has a wrong
exp_type (not PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT), we know it is not a root chipset,
thus we do not check its no_msi flag.
Brice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-03 0:39 [patch 0/7] Improve MSI detection v5 Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 1/7] Merge existing MSI disabling quirks Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 2/7] Factorize common MSI detection code from pci_enable_msi() and msix() Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 3/7] Check root chipset no_msi flag instead of all parent busses flags Brice Goglin
2006-07-04 7:06 ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-04 23:12 ` Brice Goglin
2006-07-05 3:48 ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-05 4:38 ` Brice Goglin
2006-07-06 15:39 ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-06 15:46 ` Brice Goglin [this message]
2006-07-06 0:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 4/7] Rename PCI_CAP_ID_HT_IRQCONF into PCI_CAP_ID_HT Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 5/7] Blacklist PCI-E chipsets depending on Hypertransport MSI capability Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 6/7] Drop pci_msi_quirk Brice Goglin
2006-07-03 0:40 ` [patch 7/7] Drop pci bus_flags Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AD3062.9030601@myri.com \
--to=brice@myri.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox