public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] Check root chipset no_msi flag instead of all parent busses flags
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:46:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD3062.9030601@myri.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060706153940.GA29981@colo.lackof.org>

Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:38:27AM -0400, Brice Goglin wrote:
>   
>> Grant Grundler wrote:
>>     
>>> I still don't want the generic PCI code to assume a "root"
>>> PCI Host bus controller was found after that loop.
>>>       
>> If I am not mistaken, we can use the following code to check whether we
>> found a root chipset:
>>         unsigned cap;
>>         u16 val;
>>         u8 ext_type;
>>         cap = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>>     
>
> That might work fine on x86 boxen where firmware fakes all devices
> to show up in PCI config space. That's not the case on many other
> architectures. My whole point was the pdev doesn't exist for
> a root chipset on those other arch's.
>   

Right, and the whole point of this check is to detect this case: my
while loop cannot find a root chipset on these architectures since there
is no pci_dev. So the while loop will return another pci_dev, either the
device or another bridge. When we detect that this pci_dev has a wrong
exp_type (not PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT), we know it is not a root chipset,
thus we do not check its no_msi flag.

Brice


  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-06 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-03  0:39 [patch 0/7] Improve MSI detection v5 Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 1/7] Merge existing MSI disabling quirks Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 2/7] Factorize common MSI detection code from pci_enable_msi() and msix() Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 3/7] Check root chipset no_msi flag instead of all parent busses flags Brice Goglin
2006-07-04  7:06   ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-04 23:12     ` Brice Goglin
2006-07-05  3:48       ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-05  4:38         ` Brice Goglin
2006-07-06 15:39           ` Grant Grundler
2006-07-06 15:46             ` Brice Goglin [this message]
2006-07-06  0:50   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 4/7] Rename PCI_CAP_ID_HT_IRQCONF into PCI_CAP_ID_HT Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 5/7] Blacklist PCI-E chipsets depending on Hypertransport MSI capability Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 6/7] Drop pci_msi_quirk Brice Goglin
2006-07-03  0:40 ` [patch 7/7] Drop pci bus_flags Brice Goglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44AD3062.9030601@myri.com \
    --to=brice@myri.com \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox