public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Razvan Gavril <razvan.g@plutohome.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] NFS with multiple clients connected
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:32:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD3B00.6090607@plutohome.com> (raw)

Trond Myklebust wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 18:15 +0300, Razvan Gavril wrote:
>> I have a nfs server(kernel-server) which i use as a boot server for 
>> several other machines on the network. Starting with 2.6.16 i started 
>> noticing that when having more than one of the clients doing a lot of 
>> in/out on their mounted nfs shares at list one of then starts to to have 
>> problems when writing (don't know about reading) files. For example dpkg 
>> writes strange things it the /var/lib/dpkg/status file even if it worked 
>> perfectly before the kernel upgrade.
>>
>> Every time an diskless computer fails to write corectly to the nfs 
>> filesystem i got this messages on the nfs server (dmesg):
>>
>> RPC: bad TCP reclen 0x3c390000 (large)
>> RPC: bad TCP reclen 0x31006261 (non-terminal)
>> RPC: bad TCP reclen 0x73752070 (non-terminal)
>> RPC: bad TCP reclen 0x52610100 (non-terminal)
>>
>> Is very simple to spot this behaver (1 write-error for client / 1 rpc 
>> message in server's dmesg) because apt-get is always giving an error 
>> message when the /var/lib/dpkg/status file contains something that it 
>> shouldn't. An it also can be very ease to reproduce.
>>
>> I tested with 2.6.17 and got the same error, although when using 2.6.15 
>> didn't got any errors and the clients worked perfect. Since i'm kind of 
>> forced to use a kernel version > 2.6.15 i really, really need to solve 
>> this bug. I would be glad to do it myself but i don't have the knowledge 
>> to do it so if is anybody that can help i can offer all the information 
>> that i could and also access to a system so he can track the problem.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Razvan Gavril
>
> Did the problem start when you upgraded the clients or the server?
>
> Cheers,
>   Trond
>
>
For now i only tested like this :

Server        Clients      State
-----------------------------------
2.6.15        2.6.15       Works
2.6.16        2.6.16       Fails
2.6.17        2.6.16       Fails
2.6.17        2.6.17       Fails


I did some more testing, i created a script that copies the files from a 
nfs share to another/same nfs share then checks the md5sums of the 
source and destination file, to my big surprise it worked ok. I did the 
test with relative small files (/lib) then with big files (dvds, avi) also.

The problem appears only when 2 diskless computers run apt-get in 
parallel so i suspect something related to bad file descriptors(?) 
,maybe apt is reading / writing / moving it's status files too quick. I 
can reproduce the problem in 20-30 seconds if i let more that 2 diskless 
computers run apt-get in parallel. I need to mention that the two 
diskless computers use completely different shares so there is no race 
condition in apt involved.

--
Razvan Gavril




             reply	other threads:[~2006-07-06 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-06 16:32 Razvan Gavril [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-06 15:15 [BUG] NFS with multiple clients connected Razvan Gavril
2006-07-06 15:27 ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44AD3B00.6090607@plutohome.com \
    --to=razvan.g@plutohome.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox