Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

Matthew Garrett
2006-07-09T12:17:03Z

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Now there seem to be two possible ways to go:
> 1) Drop the implementation that already is in the kernel and replace it with
> the out-of-the-tree one.

This would break existing interfaces to some extent, right? suspend2
doesn't have the same set of tunables. I'm not sure whether this is
something we especially care about, but it would potentially break some
existing userland code.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org