From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:29:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B26439.8070805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3y7v14neb.fsf@defiant.localdomain>
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net> writes:
>
>>> You're right here, I don't know why I assumed DEPENDS does it
>>> automatically.
>> Use select.
>
> It has a known problem - if the "selected" thing changes (requires
> another option etc) things are screwed. With "depends on", you don't
> have to track such changes.
>
> While near selects (in the same build directory) are IMHO ok, far
> ones are not.
>
> I think it would be different if trying to select something which
> can't be selected automatically resulted in a warning. I think
> I have to look at it then, but for now I'll use something like
> "depends on (FB_CIRRUS=m && I2C && I2C_ALGOBIT) ||
> (FB_CIRRUS=y && I2C=y && I2C_ALGOBIT=y)".
Well if the i2c code happens to depend on another module, I hope
that Jean would warn us in a timely manner :-). And even if Jean
failed to do so, it would immediately result in a compile
error/warning which should lead to an easy fix.
I still prefer 'select' just because it's easier to parse, but
either way is okay, though your method takes me a few more seconds
to understand.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200607050147.k651kxmT023763@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20060705165255.ab7f1b83.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-07-09 20:37 ` [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-09 23:53 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 9:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 10:07 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 10:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 11:27 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 11:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 12:32 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 13:09 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 14:29 ` Antonino A. Daplas [this message]
2006-07-10 14:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-27 21:23 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-10 13:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 14:11 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 15:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 16:30 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 20:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-11 7:22 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-11 10:53 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-27 20:55 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-28 10:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 15:18 ` Antonino A. Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B26439.8070805@gmail.com \
--to=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox