From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964886AbWGJPfc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:35:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965035AbWGJPfb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:35:31 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:22666 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964886AbWGJPfb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:35:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EGYsBb0KHX8FWZRUq23GeQwfSBFnoOQX9FaIL9hOAcGq/Jrs/nU26W156Hv5cHqdSwMgXIxeewNJSBH+m9xQpDWxQUsAfwfpdKd4gMmD99kG7MvqNnr5BlwOXTWohxvPc6pg9sVRrZW92oNfcKuxmRd+MJoUDrWJTiW4W9FaWeY= Message-ID: <44B273B9.8050308@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:35:21 +0800 From: "Antonino A. Daplas" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Jon Smirl , "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH , lkml , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names References: <9e4733910607092111i4c41c610u8b9df5b917cca02c@mail.gmail.com> <1152524657.27368.108.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607100541i744dd744n16c35c50dae1e98d@mail.gmail.com> <1152537049.27368.119.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607100603r5ae1a21ex1a2fa0f045424fd1@mail.gmail.com> <1152539034.27368.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607100707g4810a86boa93a5b6b0b1a8d0a@mail.gmail.com> <44B26752.9000507@gmail.com> <9e4733910607100757t4ddfaf93l1723580de551529b@mail.gmail.com> <1152544746.27368.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1152544746.27368.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Llu, 2006-07-10 am 10:57 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jon Smirl: >>> A few apps do rely on /proc/tty/drivers for the major-minor >>> to device name mapping. /dev/vc/0 does not exist (unless >>> created manually) without devfs. >> This is why I questioned if /proc/tty was really in use, it contains >> an entry that is obviously wrong for my system. > > Which tools already know about. True. I see this code snippet many times: fd = open("/dev/vc/0", FLAGS); if (fd == -1) fd = open("/dev/tty0", FLAGS); > What is so hard to understand about the > idea that pointless random changes break stuff and don't fix things. But since we're killing devfs, changing /dev/vc/0 to /dev/tty0 will be one of the nails in devfs' coffin :-) Tony