From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965310AbWGJWtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:49:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965309AbWGJWtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:49:24 -0400 Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:51028 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965310AbWGJWtX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:49:23 -0400 Message-ID: <44B2D96F.8080405@tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:49:19 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: functions returning 0 on success [was: [PATCH] Fix a memory leak in the i386 setup code] References: <20060710221308.5351.78741.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <44B2D893.9050209@tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <44B2D893.9050209@tls.msk.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=4F9CF57E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > Ofcourse, later you understand that do_something() returns 0 > on failure, and the code is correct. But the first impression > (again, for me anyway) is that it's wrong. > > In such cases when a routine returns 0 on error, I usually write > it this way: .... s/error/success/g. Blah ;) > > if (request_resource() != 0) > fail() [..] /mjt