public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove mentionings of devfs in documentation
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:45:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B3C781.8060005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711152546.GV13938@stusta.de>

Hi Adrian,

Adrian Bunk:
> Now that devfs is removed, there's no longer any need to document how to 
> do this or that with devfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> 
> ---
[snip]
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc1-mm1-full/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs	2006-07-09 11:22:37.000000000 +0200
> +++ /dev/null	2006-04-23 00:42:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
> -What:		devfs
> -Date:		July 2005
> -Contact:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> -Description:
> -	devfs has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
> -	races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
> -	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
> -	The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed,
> -	along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the
> -	kernel tree.
> -
> -Users:
> -

According to Documentation/ABI/README
"  removed/
        This directory contains a list of the old interfaces that have
        been removed from the kernel.
"

we should add devfs to removed/

Regards,
Michal

-- 
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)

Signed-off-by: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>

diff -uprN -X linux-work-clean/Documentation/dontdiff linux-work-clean/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs linux-work5/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs
--- linux-work-clean/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-work5/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs	2006-07-11 17:35:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+What:		devfs
+Date:		July 2005
+Contact:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+Description:
+	devfs has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
+	races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
+	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
+	The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed,
+	along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the
+	kernel tree.
+
+Users:
+


  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-11 15:25 [2.6 patch] remove mentionings of devfs in documentation Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 15:45 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2006-07-12  0:36   ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44B3C781.8060005@gmail.com \
    --to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox