From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Clay Barnes <clay.barnes@gmail.com>
Cc: Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Lyamin aka FLX <flx@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: short term task list for Reiser4
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:11:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B43019.9010402@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711222903.GG9220@HAL_5000D.tc.ph.cox.net>
Clay Barnes wrote:
>On 15:04 Tue 11 Jul , Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>
>>6) optimize fsync --- substantive task which requires using fixed area
>>for write twice logging, and using write twice logging for fsync'd
>>data. It might require creating mount options to choose whether to
>>optimize for serialized sequential fsyncs vs. lazy fsyncs.
>>
>>
>With the serialized sequential fsync, is that essentially what I was
>talking about earlier with slowly streaming dirty writes to disk when
>the HDD is idle? If that's the case, I don't see the advantage in having
>lazy fsyncs
>
if you are optimizing throughput rather than latency, then you let
things get to disk whenever they get there, and you let the app hang
while it waits. A mailer processing many requests in parallel might find
30 seconds of latency to be just fine but a database might find 3
seconds of latency to be too much. (I make up these examples, mailer
programmers please correct me.)
> except in situations where you want to keep the HDD spun down
>as much as possible.
>
No, that is not when you do it.
>I've been meaning to hose my laptop (assuming I fix one problem with my
>desktop), so I am willing to help write Gentoo install docs (or possibly
>Arch Linux). I can also test exsiting instructions.
>
>
That would be way cool.
<http://wiki.namesys.com/Reiser4-GettingStarted#preview>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-11 22:04 short term task list for Reiser4 Hans Reiser
2006-07-11 22:29 ` Clay Barnes
2006-07-11 23:11 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-07-11 23:55 ` Clay Barnes
2006-07-12 0:06 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-13 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-13 19:53 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-13 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-14 7:05 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B43019.9010402@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Reiserfs-List@namesys.com \
--cc=clay.barnes@gmail.com \
--cc=flx@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox