From: Alessio Sangalli <alesan@manoweb.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cardbus: revert IO window limit
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:29:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B5E845.1040708@manoweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607120816070.5623@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>> PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
>> PCI quirk: region 1000-103f claimed by PIIX4 ACPI
>> PCI quirk: region 1400-140f claimed by PIIX4 SMB
>> PIIX4 devres C PIO at 0398-0399
>
> Thanks, that explains it. Anybody who allocated region 1000 and 1400 would
> clash with the built-in PIIX magic IO regions, and any driver that tried
> to access those regions would instead end up accessing magic SMBus or ACPI
> registers.
>
> So your lock-ups are very understandable indeed, and I'll apply this to
> the standard kernel. MUCH better than reverting the IO window limits.
Ok I'm glad we (you) have found the best solution.
Remember you are all welcome at the Planetarium of Lecco, Italy ;)
Thank you
Alessio Sangalli IZ2GMV
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-13 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-30 22:03 [PATCH] cardbus: revert IO window limit Daniel Ritz
2006-06-30 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-30 23:09 ` Daniel Ritz
2006-06-30 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-05 6:56 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-12 7:55 ` Alessio Sangalli
2006-07-12 15:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-13 6:29 ` Alessio Sangalli [this message]
2006-07-12 7:29 ` Alessio Sangalli
2006-07-12 6:54 ` Alessio Sangalli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-05 18:29 Mallick, Asit K
2006-06-22 6:48 Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-22 7:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 7:53 ` Alessio Sangalli
2006-06-22 11:35 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-22 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-22 16:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-22 20:01 ` Alessio Sangalli
2006-06-22 21:27 ` Alessio Sangalli
2006-06-30 4:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-30 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-30 19:19 ` Dave Jones
2006-06-30 19:26 ` Dave Jones
2006-06-30 22:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-22 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B5E845.1040708@manoweb.com \
--to=alesan@manoweb.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox