From: Bhavana Nagendra <bnagendr@redhat.com>
To: "shin, jacob" <jacob.shin@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Deguara, Joachim" <joachim.deguara@amd.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>,
discuss@x86-64.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to changepstate at same time
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:58:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B65F8B.2020309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B3870AD84389624BAF87A3C7B831499302935A88@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com>
Here are some results without changing frequencies on a system whose
BIOS does not support Power Now! on MP systems:
Basically the system booted up with "nohpet, nopmtimer"i.e. using TSC as
the GTOD time source and system stayed idle for 13 hours. There
appears to be drift of 20 secs in the CPU 2 readings. This TSC drift
could worsen when
the system is active and doing GTOD operations and/or when system is up
a lot longer.
CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -108 cycles, maxerr 826
cycles)
CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -119 cycles, maxerr 845
cycles)
*** CPUs go offline ***
*** back online ***
CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -117 cycles, maxerr 846
cycles)
CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -117 cycles, maxerr 845
cycles)
shin, jacob wrote:
>On Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:32 AM Deguara, Joachim wrote:
>
>
>
>>parallel sounds fun, but I don't get it. Two machine or trying to go
>>online and offline at the same time? Firestorming two busy parallel
>>while loops, one turning the core offline and the other online, did
>>not bring an oops so I guess this kernel is in the clear in that
>>regard.
>>
>>I can't get it to crash again and I am afraid that it crashed under an
>>old devel kernel. After another ~20 hour test with heavy freq changes
>>with the tscsync patch
>>
>>
>
>There were several different issues w/ powernow + cpu hotplug in the
>past. Good to hear that the latest kernel doesn't oops.. I believe
>cpu hotplug is needed for suspend to work..
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-13 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-13 14:40 [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to changepstate at same time shin, jacob
2006-07-13 14:58 ` Bhavana Nagendra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B65F8B.2020309@redhat.com \
--to=bnagendr@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox