From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: mbligh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc1-git4 and 2.6.18-rc1-mm1 OOM's on boot
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B756AB.50102@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060714010858.d6824f1f.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:00:36 +0100
> Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
>
>>> Yep, I've run this with badari's fix as a set across the whole family. I
>>> did all dbenchall runs for now as this example is showing on that and
>>> badari's is triggered same. If there is any measure of success there
>>> I'll throw in the externals too.
>> General goodness from this one. Except where we're getting issues with
>> the e1000's. That seems to be fixed up by backing out some driver changes.
>>
>> All moot, as -mm2 is showing similar goodness.
>
> Is -mm2's e1000 OK?
Whilst calling it the e1000 problem (that was how it was originally
reported) I should say that this was related to the sysfs change in the
following patches:
gregkh-driver-network-class_device-to-device.patch
gregkh-driver-class_device_rename-remove.patch
I have two boxes under test which were failing on -mm1 similar to teh
following (from userland):
eth-id-00:02:55:d3:37:4a No interface found
Both are booting -mm2 fine.
I can only see two outstanding issues. An IDE lost interrupt issue on a
blade we have under test which I believe benh is looking at, and what
looks like an s390 tool chain issue which I am told is being looked at.
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-14 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-12 16:53 2.6.18-rc1-git4 and 2.6.18-rc1-mm1 OOM's on boot Martin Bligh
2006-07-13 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-13 1:24 ` Martin Bligh
2006-07-13 14:12 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-07-14 8:00 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-07-14 8:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 8:32 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2006-07-14 10:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B756AB.50102@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox