From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161124AbWGNVB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:01:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161126AbWGNVB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:01:57 -0400 Received: from jg555.com ([64.30.195.78]:1152 "EHLO jg555.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161124AbWGNVB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:01:57 -0400 Message-ID: <44B80543.4050608@jg555.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:57:39 -0700 From: Jim Gifford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: dwmw2@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: 2.6.18 Headers - Long References: <44B7F062.8040102@jg555.com> <1152905987.3159.46.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1152908202.3191.98.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20060714.131957.57444250.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20060714.131957.57444250.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When I wrote my script to sanitize, I was really surprised on which headers gets utilized and which ones didn't.. I have it down to the bare minimums in my script. As far as glibc goes, from my people who are helping me the alpha architecture is the culprit there. Do we have a list of what headers are "user-space" and which ones should not be "user-space"? Also David W, let me know what I can do to help you out, a lot of people on my end want to get this working properly. Who's maintaining util-linux these days, we probably should get a patch to them.