From: Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>
To: Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Subject: Re: bttv-driver.c:3964: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:03:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44BC4F83.6060108@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44BC015A.5090104@linuxtv.org>
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Nish Aravamudan wrote:
>> On 7/17/06, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>>> Hmmm... This was caused by the "Check all __must_check warnings in
>>> bttv." patch from Randy Dunlap (cc's from original thread added)
>>>
>>> I am aware that this was done for various reasons of sanity checking,
>>> however, we cannot check the return value of a void ;-)
>> For the sanity checking, I don't think video_device_create_file()
>> should be a void function. It probably should return
>> class_device_create_file()'s return value, no? As it can fail...
>>
>
> You are correct... I was merely pointing out the error, but now I see it
> runs deeper than I had thought. I will fix both
> video_device_create_file and video_device_remove_file to return the
> class_device_foo return values, then I'll push it over to Mauro.
I was in a rush when I wrote that, and I wasn't thinking.
video_device_remove_file stays as a void.
Anyway, here is the fix. This is already in my tree (
http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mkrufky/v4l-dvb ) but split into separate patches.
no s-o-b needed for now -- this will come up through Mauro.
diff -upr master/linux/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
--- master/linux/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
2006-07-17 22:57:05.000000000 -0400
+++ v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
2006-07-17 21:55:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -3942,10 +3942,6 @@ static void bttv_unregister_video(struct
/* register video4linux devices */
static int __devinit bttv_register_video(struct bttv *btv)
{
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,17)
- int ret;
-#endif
-
if (no_overlay <= 0) {
bttv_video_template.type |= VID_TYPE_OVERLAY;
} else {
@@ -3960,17 +3956,10 @@ static int __devinit bttv_register_video
goto err;
printk(KERN_INFO "bttv%d: registered device video%d\n",
btv->c.nr,btv->video_dev->minor & 0x1f);
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,17)
- ret = video_device_create_file(btv->video_dev,
&class_device_attr_card);
- if (ret < 0)
- printk(KERN_WARNING "bttv: video_device_create_file error: "
- "%d\n", ret);
-#else
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,0)
video_device_create_file(btv->video_dev, &class_device_attr_card);
#endif
-#endif
/* vbi */
btv->vbi_dev = vdev_init(btv, &bttv_vbi_template, "vbi");
diff -upr master/linux/include/media/v4l2-dev.h
v4l-dvb/linux/include/media/v4l2-dev.h
--- master/linux/include/media/v4l2-dev.h 2006-07-17
22:57:06.000000000 -0400
+++ v4l-dvb/linux/include/media/v4l2-dev.h 2006-07-17
22:34:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -376,11 +376,14 @@ extern struct video_device* video_devdat
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,0)
#define to_video_device(cd) container_of(cd, struct video_device,
class_dev)
-static inline void
+static inline int
video_device_create_file(struct video_device *vfd,
struct class_device_attribute *attr)
{
- class_device_create_file(&vfd->class_dev, attr);
+ int ret = class_device_create_file(&vfd->class_dev, attr);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s error: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, ret);
+ return ret;
}
static inline void
video_device_remove_file(struct video_device *vfd,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060717124505.GD7281@neu.nirvana>
2006-07-17 19:53 ` bttv-driver.c:3964: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be Michael Krufky
2006-07-17 20:55 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-07-17 21:30 ` Michael Krufky
2006-07-18 3:03 ` Michael Krufky [this message]
2006-07-18 3:30 Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44BC4F83.6060108@linuxtv.org \
--to=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
--cc=Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox