From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932408AbWGRW4j (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:56:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932405AbWGRW4Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:56:24 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:58039 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932402AbWGRW4G (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:56:06 -0400 Message-ID: <44BD4956.5020706@goop.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:49:26 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Zachary Amsden , Ian Pratt , Christian Limpach , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarch References: <20060718091807.467468000@sous-sol.org> <20060718091950.750213000@sous-sol.org> <1153217033.3038.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1153217033.3038.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > what is this for? Isn't this 1) undocumented and 2) unclear and 3) > ugly ? (I'm pretty sure the HAVE_ARCH_* stuff is highly deprecated for > new things nowadays) > It appears to be completely unnecessary. Xen doesn't use sanitize_e820_map(), but there's no obvious harm in leaving it there (and it's init code, so there's no long-term cost). J