From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@namesys.com>,
vs <vs@thebsh.namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 status (correction)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:44:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C093D2.1040703@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C043B5.3070501@slaphack.com>
David Masover wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>> On a more positive note, Reiser4.1 is getting closer to release....
>
>
> Good news! But it's been awhile since I've followed development, and
> the homepage seems out of date (as usual). Where can I find a list of
> changes since v4?
>
> By "out of date", I mean things like this:
>
> "Reiser4.1 will modify the repacker to insert controlled "air holes",
> as it is well known that insertion efficiency is harmed by overly
> tight packing."
Sigh, no, the repacker will probably be after 4.1....
The list of tasks for zam looks something like:
fix bugs that arise
debug read optimization code (CPU reduction only, has no effect on IO),
1 week est. (would be nice if it was less)
review compression code 1 day per week until it ships.
fix fsync performance (est. 1 week of time to make post-commit writes
asynchronous, maybe 3 weeks to create fixed-reserve for write twice
blocks, and make all fsync blocks write twice)
write repacker (12 weeks).
I am not sure that putting the repacker after fsync is the right choice....
The task list for vs looks like:
* fix bugs as they arise.
* fix whatever lkml complains about that either seems reasonable, or
that akpm agrees with.
* Help edward get the compression plugins out the door.
* Improve fsck's time performance.
* Fix any V3 bugs that Chris and Jeff don't fix for us. Which reminds
me, I need to check on whether the 90% full bug got fixed....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-21 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-20 21:59 reiser4 status (correction) Hans Reiser
[not found] ` <44C043B5.3070501@slaphack.com>
2006-07-21 8:44 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-07-21 19:13 ` David Masover
2006-07-21 20:41 ` Mike Benoit
2006-07-21 21:06 ` David Masover
2006-07-22 0:49 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C093D2.1040703@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=vs@thebsh.namesys.com \
--cc=zam@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox